DeviantART and Wacom are proud to present the second Intuos4 "Bring Your Vision To Life" contest! Open to all artists all over the world, we challenge you to show us your dreams and aspirations for the future. Get drawing!
Artist's Comments
Provided that I get to fix some nasty behavior with Internet Exploer (who doesn't follow the standards, and makes us all suffer because of that) and to find out how I am supposed to accomodate it to the current Inkscape website engine, I'm going to submit this design to this contest.
As you can see, the design is clean. It uses no tables nor frames nor any other weird elements. Its HTML and CSS validate. It seems to display reasonably well in resolutions ranging from 800x600 (a rather tight fit, but still functional) to (of course) larger ones. I can tell that it is not the most ergonomic design, that for sure. For starters, using fixed width is usually not very desirable when you want to display a lot of text content that can vary in size. Now add to it the fact that this uses fixed height too. In small resolutions it is a tight fit, and in larger ones there is quite a lot of space wasted around it (though `horror vacui' is not one of my problems, I kinda like it with all that white space around)... ...but we are talking about a design tool here. Perhaps it is interesting to display design in the site as well, even if it cripples slightly functionality. I like the effect of the mountain top in the background. I like the choosing of Garamond for the menu items. I like the floating inkscape logo, suspended over the box border. I like the `Draw Freely.' line in pushkin's handwriting below. I like its simplicity, almost to a minimalistic extrem. I like the black on white and white on black. I really like it, so that is that. However, I will appreciate very much any comments and help you can provide on any aspect of the website: CSS and HTML optimization, accesibility, design, usability -- anything. |
Details
September 4, 2005
113 KB 1211×1008 StatisticsShare
Link
Embed
Thumb
|
Comments
One suggestion, though: when I first visit the site, my eye automatically goes to the top of the right panel, and has to confusedly search downwards to reach the explanation of Inkscape. I think that if you took the first line or so and put it at the top in black (fit to the mountain of course and in line with general), it would read better, although you have to figure out the break afterwards anyway. You could start the inner text with something like "Inkscape supports SVG features including shapes, paths, ..." What do you think about adding a little 50% gray to the image? Maybe the heading border things would look nice in gray. Also, I think you should put the inky trail of the logo at the bottom! I think you could figure out a clever way to fit "More News Options" into there similar to at the top.
I hope this is helpful in improving your design. I love it. Great work!
--
Chromakode |
But thanks-a-heap. I value highly your oppinion.
I can see what you mean with the issue on the first lines of text. However, I am not sure that it would work well, because part of the appeal of the page is its unusual disposition. Even further, I think it works quite well the fact that this awkwardness is temporary, and that once you scroll down it arranges to a more practical text-block layout. I'll try what you say, though, just to see what happens.
Regarding the 50% gray... I'll have to give it a try too. Until now, however, I've tried to keep the page almost completely monochrome -- save for the gray hightlights in the left menu, and in the visited links in the footer. Part of the idea is to stress those two colours -- black and white, no more. It's kinda defying the viewer: "this is the website of a design program, but we are so cool that we are not going to place pretty colours and pictures anywhere."
What I do reall think is a great idea is the ink-trail one -- I'm gonna give it a try this very night, for I think it has a lot of potential. I knew that somethin was not really right with the bottom of the pate, but I couldn't put my finger on it... Now I know. I think that can give the page a very nice touch and a feeling of completeness. ĄThanks a heap!
--
I feel compelled to reply. It's DeviantART comment engine's fault, not mine.
--
Chromakode |
--
I feel compelled to reply. It's DeviantART comment engine's fault, not mine.
I think that pulls the design together - it demonstrates one of the nicest things about inkscape: it scales.
--
Chromakode |
Other great aspect is editability -- you can always change whatever you want with little fuss.
--
I feel compelled to reply. It's DeviantART comment engine's fault, not mine.
I don't like the fact that it's in a wee little box but that's just a personal preference, or it could just be that my res is too high and I'm using IE.
The height and the width of the box are fixed. That is needed for the design, because it relies on the background image having a certain width (I think I could manage to make the rest of the elements scalable).
But I don't see a way around it as the design is right now, and it annoys me slightly.
Thanks for the rest of the compliments, though.
So it looks reasonably good in IE?
Have you compared it with how it looks in Firefox?
--
I feel compelled to reply. It's DeviantART comment engine's fault, not mine.
Did you make (or co-make) inkscape?
--
Previous Page12Next Page